Monday, September 28, 2015

Wilks' "Fitting the Pattern": A Close Lens on the Construction & Relationship of Identity


The image above gives more than just an interlude into Christine Wilks' e-lit work "Fitting the Pattern." Likewise, the Flash narrative conveys a specific idea about how identity is both shaped and represented utilizing our modern day digital literature as a lens. Accordingly, Wilks states at the beginning description of her work that "here stitches are links, cloth fragments also textual fragments, and the reader is the tailor who must bring it all together to complete the pattern and make the narrative cohere." In this way, both choice and chance seem to intertwine in this clever work of mash-ups and non-linear narration, whereas a girl's gendered identity gets compared and measured against the shadow of her mother's figure. Thus, it is apparent that identity is all at once a fluid and yet fragmented part of being that becomes constructed via the process of socialization, or interaction, in which experiences may vary.
Through the intentional use of multi-modal elements, such as sound, image, and advanced effects, Wilks creates a work which imagines and shows the way that format and content function in tandem to make new, and highlight existing, meanings regarding how memory and relationships determine identity. As the reader dives into the work and opens up the first screen page, they are presented with the 'jello-like' two-dimensional animation of a female form, which shrinks and expands, evoking the very idea of 'fitting the pattern.' There is also a 'page layout' included, which appears as pieces that need threading together in order to conduct both narrative and character identity. Wilks additionally includes four dress-making tools (or cursor images) to choose from in (any) order to cut, sew, pin, and unpick clothing. These tools also make unique sounds of their own when in use, adding mnemonic devices which ironically affect the reader's memories and, likely, their construction of the daughter's identity. For instance, when the scissors are chosen as a utensil, their cutting literally intermingles with the changing of the page or text. In this regard, the use of them enforces the meaning of the text and textiles that are fabricated on the screen. Additionally, the tool sounds faintly resemble those of writing tools (i.e. a printer, fax machine, a typewriter etc.), provoking the reader to both engage and draw on their own ideas, and bridge connections to memories. For example, sounds related to copying, tearing, typing or the construction of identical models. As if Wilks is implying an intentional echo effect, including sound, image, and text movement, in order to construe the interweaving of memory, writing, and the relationship in between.
In conclusion, it appears that Wilks' "Fitting the Pattern" not only deliberately shows how memory and relationships forge identity. But it also conveys how construction not always involves the same method, or linearity, which subsequently affects a different outcome (or construction) as well. Thus, many elements (multi-modal), especially in the case of this digital work, are utilized interchangeably to create, tear apart, and rebuild different models each and every time the reader interacts. As a result, the daughter's identity will never exactly fit that of her mother's. Similar to a hand-made dress made following the exact same instructions, the odds of an identical copy are not probable. Therefore, the elements work with the stereotypical idea of construction by working against it. By deconstructing preconceived notions of the process of linearity in either storytelling, or the fabrication of a copied identity, simultaneously, Wilks' e-lit work shows how format and content are symbiotically related; such as one form or another (i.e. identity) cannot exist without the other.

1 comment:

  1. Good work here!. I am reading this post last, so I am making connections between it and your other posts... all in an effort to help guide you back to your writing to stitch it together (couldn't help myself!) into a single argument and essay. Here's what I have for you:

    You are definitely pursuing, across your blog posts, different articulations of a single thesis statement for this essay. Here is one strong articulation,"it is apparent that identity is all at once a fluid and yet fragmented part of being that becomes constructed via the process of socialization, or interaction." Indeed, you as write in your other blog posts, the role of media and mediation is part of this too.

    I like your focus on "mnemonic devices" and wonder if that is not a topic that also connects your interpretation of the 3 works. Seems to me that are you interested in how memory is activated and mediated to produce a sense of self, and that you are exploring the ways in which these works pursue and represent this idea.

    You also seem to be interested in pursuing the multimodal aspects of memory construction and representation, especially the sonic elements. I would make that a central part of your essay too. For, the mulimodal aspects (particularly sound files) are one of the things that are quite unique to digital literature, right?

    Finally, you seem interested in stereotypes and how these works challenge them. I would caution you to be clear about what those stereotypes are and to make sure that they are not your own personal generalizations; in other words, ground them in the text or in secondary research of some sort. And then be clear and careful about how and why the work's deconstruct them.

    Good work!

    ReplyDelete